Why is Sustainable Development Important?
Our Impact on Natural Resources
There
is a growing consensus that current forms of development are not sustainable
(12). For example, if all countries followed the
European model of development
we would need at least another two planets to provide the resources, absorb
the wastes and provide life support systems. One North American uses as
much energy as over 200 West or East Africans. Sustainable development
looks at issues of equality - 80% of the world’s resources are used
by 20% of the world’s population; can we allow this to continue?
It also considers ecological issues - we are losing up to 137 species
worldwide each day from tropical rainforests alone (13)
due to the effects of human 'development'; What are the effects on other
species and food chains?
It is becoming increasingly clear that current forms of development are
undermining the environmental support systems on which the human race
(not to mention all the other species) depends for survival.
The Economic Argument
Economic development today is usually measured by the increase in average
incomes, but in origin economy means managing resources. Sustainable development
is important, as it takes into account equity (social justice) and environment,
as well as economic factors (beyond the narrow definition), in order to
ensure a more balanced form of development.
The Three Circles Model
Many
organisations use the three
circles model (14) showing the need for balance
between Environment, Equity and Economy, to bring about sustainable development.
In practice there is debate about whether all the circles are equal. Most
governments and businesses seem to see the Economy (and economic
growth (15)) as most important, although conventional
economic growth may be unsustainable and is often very unequal. Those
from a Development Education background usually see the Equity / Social
circle as most important, as they would argue that sustainable development
will come about or not by human actions.
The Ecological Limits Model
A
more radical view of sustainable development questions the whole way we
look at the world and our relationship to it. This can be seen in the
‘Ecological
Limits’ model In this model, the defining limit is the Ecology
of the planet – we have to accept that we depend on the Biosphere
for survival (unless we are going to colonise other planets). The economy
should serve to support human needs within these ecological limits. Those
from an Environmental Education background would connect more readily
with this view, though a truly global perspective needs to be taken on
board. WWF has started to talk about 'One Planet Living' to reflect this
idea (16).
Spiritual Transformation
Some feel that we will not achieve sustainability without some
form of Spiritual transformation - that we need to see ourselves as part
of something greater (17). This does not necessarily
mean believing in a creator, but appreciating that humans are just a part
of a bigger picture and that we diminish ourselves by only viewing nature
in terms only of its value to human kind. Most pre-industrial societies
had (and have) this sense of connectivity from their daily dependence
on natural cycles. How those growing up in urban areas achieve a sense
of reverence for the natural world is a challenge for parents and educators.
There is also a need to examine the values needed for sustainable living
and to question the prevalent culture of consumerism and materialism,
by which young people are increasingly bombarded from an early and impressionable
age. See the Polyp cartoon 'Happiness is just around the corner' in our
resources
section >>
Critics and Counter Arguments
Critics of sustainable development (or what is often simplistically termed
'green' thinking) say that to put such store on the environment implies
reverting to living pre-modern lifestyles. However a counter argument
is the need to think smarter about how we use resources, embodied in such
theories as Factor Four and Factor Ten
(18). Sustainability is essentially about focussing
on Quality of Life issues, rather than Standar of Living and promoting
a far more efficient and equitable use of resources. Ultimately, as the
section 'What is development?'
points up, the development path chosen nationally or internationally is
significantly determined by political decisions. This is one reason why
the Development
Compass Rose (19) is such a useful tool for looking
at issues from natural, economic, social and (who decides) political points
of view.
However, one of the drawbacks of most contemporary political systems is
an absence of emphasis on futurity - most electoral programmes only look
a few years ahead, whereas sustainability requires thinking fifty to a
hundred years or more ahead.
Your values, beliefs and aims for the future will affect how you view
development issues and the concepts of sustainability / sustainable development.
References
12 World Resources Institute:
http://www.wri.org/facts/ecobytes.html
13 NASA Earth Observatory Site:
http://www.earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/Deforestation/deforestation/deforestation_3.html
14 World Bank Website
http://www.worldbank.org/
15 UK Strategy for Sustainable Development:
http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/sustainable/quality/life/index.htm/
16 World Wildlife Fund Website
http://www.wwf-uk.org/
17 'Being not Doing' Martin Palmer
http://www.wwflearning.co.uk/news/viewpoint_0000000533.asp/
18 Factor Four is the idea that resource
productivity should be quadrupled so that wealth is doubled and resource
use is halved. The concept has been summed up as "doing more with
less". It is argued that this would result in substantial macro-economic
gains.
Factor Ten is the idea that per capita material flows
from rich countries need to be reduced by 90% to hit the Factor Four target
because they are responsible for five times as much resource use as Southern
countries. See http://www.bsdglobal.com/
19 See the Developing
Citizenship website for more information about the Development Compass
Rose. There is a briefing sheet on using the Development Compass Rose
in our methodologies
section too.
|